"Why I started this web-site"


( About Anti-Apathy )


In 1975, while performing my duties as an U.S. Border Patrol Agent I was forced to verbally defend myself against a drunken farmer/politician due to the stupidity of two "big shots". This caused big trouble for the "big shots", one of them lied to the Border Patrol Central Office in Washington, DC and I became a target of his vendetta from that time to May of 1981 when I followed my doctor's advice and he wrote me up for medical retirement due to an on the job injury. Shortly thereafter the "big shot" turned his vendetta over to his political sugar daddy, and the vendetta against me turned into a "political vendetta", which persists to this day, and since that day I quit being "apathetic" about not only what was going on in the political world around me, but about every aspect of government and those who deal with the government. From 1983 to this day I have been without an income because those willing to do others' "dirty work" caused my benefits checks to be diverted to a fiduciary, thinking I would soon submit to their "plan" out of destitution. Since no lawyer in the nation will touch a case involving a political vendetta, I was forced to file four lawsuits in federal courts in order to fight the vendetta. One of them has been in the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals since 1985. In that year a man who was the Chief of the Business and Industry Loan Division, Farmer Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, State of Oklahoma had become, a few years before, the target of the most vicious political vendetta in the history of the nation simply because he was an honest man and attempted to "blow the whistle" on a nationwide federal loan fraud scheme in which billions of dollars annually are being stolen from the U.S. taxpayer. After he spent his life's savings fighting a thirty one count bogus criminal indictment (to which the lawyer he hired did his dead level best to get him to plead guilty) he called me, knowing I had experience filing actions in federal courts, and asked for my help in fighting a civil action filed against him the day he called, asking for two million, nine hundred thousand dollars in damages for violating his fiduciary duties (in the criminal indictment his letter authorizing him to approve U.S. Government backing of loans up to and including one million dollars without further review by higher office had been illegally removed from his personnel folder without his knowledge). I examined his files, the dismissed criminal indictment, and the civil complaint against him he had just received, and realized immediately the U.S. Government including investigators, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Attorney's Office were systematically trying to destroy him both physically and financially, and were all but guaranteed the cooperation af any lawyer he might hire. I helped him answer the complaint (a simple matter), and advised him to act as his own attorney from then on (any lawyer he might have hired would have sold him down the river), told him the government would never let such a stupidly styled lawsuit go before a jury, watch for an almost hidden "motion for Summary Judgment", and, when he discovered it to controvert their "Statement of Facts", file his pleaing or answer, and then just sit back and wait for the government to drop the lawsuit, which is exactly what happened. Since that time I have furnished proof to the largest newspaper in every state in the nation and D.C. of the "Scheme", and have received nothing but a deafening silence. I have also supplied proof to politicians of every description, news show hosts on both radio and TV, and have received nothing but silence or the brush off. I have met this kind of resistance because thousands of so called prominent bankers, businessmen, politicians and bureaucrats would go to jail, shich is exactly why the U.S. Senate did not call one witness to testify before the Clinton impeachment trial - Clinton would have taken the entire bunch down with him - and that is exactly why Kenneth Starr whitewashed the federal loan fraud scheme he had to have discovered after Sam McDougal testified that the Clintons, while Bill Clinton was Governor of Arkansas, received three hundred thousand dollars, their share of the one million dollar fraudulent loan, one hundred thousand dollars of which Hilary Clinton fraudulently claimed on her income tax return for that year was a ten thousand percent return on a one thousand dollar "pork belly" futures investment she claims to have made - she never invested a openny in "pork belly futures", and Kenneth Starr knew it all along. I have e-mailed this story to many old friends, and other e-mail acquaintances, and, with the exception of a very few, as well as the Network of Patriots, I have been rewarded with nothing but apathy. Therefore I establish this web-site with the hopes it will counter apathy in all who are apathetic and visit it.

Enter